Homo Erectus 340
854,636 99%
Homo Erectus 340
3 lata/lat temu
,jpeg/024/765/366/1280x720.17180507.jpg)
,jpeg/018/958/824/v2/320x180.252.jpg)
,jpeg/016/077/202/v2/320x180.222.jpg)
,jpeg/018/829/957/v2/320x180.205.jpg)
,jpeg/024/053/791/v2/320x180.235.jpg)
,jpeg/015/677/375/v2/320x180.263.jpg)
,jpeg/016/089/948/v2/320x180.208.jpg)
,jpeg/016/878/028/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/024/773/834/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/006/887/530/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/016/048/055/v2/320x180.246.jpg)
Komentarze
33
zaloguj się lub zarejestruj się, aby dodawać komentarze
They should have used make-up to cover the tattoos. I imagine those would be pretty uncommon in the 1860s. I find it immersion-breaking. Especially the porno-y placement.
Not the people in the comments complaining about historic accuracy ajskdjfjgk
whos cares about Tattoos..they fuck and cum like i i love it.
Condom killed the romance
In addition to the tattoos, circumcision in the US was uncommon at this time too.